Competitor Analysis Template for Startups: A Step-by-Step Framework
Learn how to analyze competitors systematically with our free template. Covers direct vs indirect competitors, positioning, and finding competitive gaps.
Competitor Analysis Template for Startups: A Step-by-Step Framework
In 2011, two Stanford students launched a photo-sharing app into a market dominated by Facebook, Flickr, and dozens of well-funded competitors.
Instagram didn't win by ignoring the competition. They won by understanding it obsessively. They knew Facebook was slow to mobile. They knew Flickr was cluttered and complicated. They knew Hipstamatic had the filters but lacked the social graph.
So they built exactly what the market needed: simple, beautiful, mobile-first photo sharing with effortless social features.
Thirteen months later, Facebook bought them for $1 billion.
Most founders skip competitor analysis or treat it as a checkbox exercise. They glance at a few websites, declare themselves "differentiated," and move on. Then they're blindsided when a competitor launches a feature they didn't see coming, undercuts their pricing, or dominates a channel they ignored.
This guide gives you a systematic competitor analysis template you can use today. Not theory—an actual framework with specific questions, data sources, and a worked example.
Why Competitor Analysis Matters (More Than You Think)
Competitor analysis isn't about copying what others do. It's about understanding the battlefield so you can find your unfair advantage.
Good competitor analysis tells you:
- Where the gaps are: What customer needs are underserved?
- What's table stakes: What features must you have just to compete?
- How to position: What angle makes you clearly different?
- Where to focus: Which segments are overcrowded vs. underserved?
- What to avoid: Which mistakes have others already made?
Stewart Butterfield, Slack's founder, spent months studying HipChat, Yammer, and Campfire before building Slack. He didn't copy them. He identified what they all got wrong—the user experience felt like work, not play—and built something that felt different from minute one.
Direct vs. Indirect Competitors
Before you start analyzing, you need to categorize correctly.
Direct Competitors
These solve the same problem for the same customer in a similar way. If you're building project management software for marketing teams, your direct competitors are other project management tools targeting marketers.
Direct competitors fight for the same budget line item. When a prospect evaluates you, these are the alternatives in their spreadsheet.
Indirect Competitors
These solve the same underlying problem but in a fundamentally different way. For project management software, indirect competitors include:
- Spreadsheets (the default "tool" for many teams)
- Email threads (how work often gets coordinated without dedicated software)
- Slack/Teams (async communication that sometimes replaces PM tools)
- Nothing (manual processes, sticky notes, memory)
Indirect competitors are often more dangerous than direct ones. You're not just competing for budget—you're competing for behavioral change.
Potential Entrants
These are companies in adjacent markets who could easily enter your space. For project management:
- CRM vendors expanding into project workflows
- Communication tools adding task management
- Vertical SaaS players adding horizontal features
Watch these closely. Atlassian didn't start as Jira—they expanded into it from Confluence.
The Competitor Analysis Template
Here's the framework. For each competitor, fill out these eight sections.
Section 1: Company Overview
| Field | Information to Gather |
|---|---|
| Company name | Official name and any product names |
| Founded | Year founded |
| Funding | Total raised, last round, investors |
| Team size | Estimated headcount (LinkedIn) |
| Headquarters | Location, remote/distributed status |
| Target market | Who they explicitly sell to |
Why it matters: Funding and team size indicate resources and ambition. A bootstrapped 5-person team competes differently than a Series B startup with 80 employees.
Section 2: Product & Features
| Category | Questions to Answer |
|---|---|
| Core features | What does the product actually do? |
| Unique features | What do they have that others don't? |
| Missing features | What obvious features are absent? |
| Platform | Web, mobile, desktop, API? |
| Integrations | What other tools does it connect to? |
| Technical approach | Any notable tech (AI, real-time, etc.)? |
How to find this: Product pages, demo videos, free trials, G2/Capterra feature comparisons, and customer reviews mentioning specific functionality.
Section 3: Pricing & Packaging
| Element | Details to Capture |
|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per user, flat rate, usage-based, freemium? |
| Price points | Actual dollar amounts per tier |
| Free tier | What's included, what's limited? |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing, what triggers it? |
| Annual discount | Discount for yearly commitment |
| Hidden costs | Implementation, training, add-ons? |
Why it matters: Pricing signals positioning. High prices suggest enterprise focus. Freemium suggests growth-led. Per-user pricing suggests collaboration tools.
Section 4: Positioning & Messaging
| Element | What to Analyze |
|---|---|
| Tagline | Their one-sentence pitch |
| Homepage hero | Main value proposition above the fold |
| Key benefits | Top 3-5 benefits they emphasize |
| Target persona | Who the messaging speaks to |
| Tone | Professional, casual, technical, friendly? |
| Differentiation claim | How they say they're different |
How to analyze: Screenshot their homepage. Read it as if you were a prospect. What would you remember after 10 seconds?
Section 5: Customer Feedback
| Source | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| G2/Capterra reviews | Star ratings, common complaints, praised features |
| App store reviews | Mobile app quality, specific issues |
| Reddit/Twitter | Unfiltered opinions, community sentiment |
| Case studies | What customers they feature, what results they claim |
| Testimonials | Who endorses them, what they say |
The gold is in the complaints. Five-star reviews rarely teach you anything. One- and two-star reviews reveal product gaps, support failures, and unmet expectations you can exploit.
Section 6: Go-to-Market
| Channel | Evidence to Gather |
|---|---|
| Website traffic | SimilarWeb estimates, trends |
| SEO | What keywords do they rank for? |
| Content marketing | Blog frequency, topics, quality |
| Paid ads | Are they running Google/social ads? |
| Social presence | Followers, engagement, platforms |
| Sales model | Self-serve, sales-assisted, enterprise? |
How to research: SimilarWeb (free tier), Ahrefs/SEMrush (if available), their LinkedIn page, Facebook Ad Library, Google "site:competitor.com" to see indexed pages.
Section 7: Strengths & Weaknesses
| Assessment | Your Analysis |
|---|---|
| Core strengths | What do they do genuinely well? |
| Competitive moat | What's hard to replicate? |
| Key weaknesses | Where do they fall short? |
| Vulnerable segments | Which customers are poorly served? |
Be honest about strengths. If a competitor is genuinely better at something, acknowledge it. Denial doesn't help you compete.
Section 8: Strategic Implications
| Question | Your Conclusion |
|---|---|
| Threat level | High / Medium / Low |
| Overlap | How much do you compete directly? |
| Positioning opportunity | How can you differentiate? |
| Features to match | What must you have to compete? |
| Features to leapfrog | Where can you be 10x better? |
Worked Example: Project Management SaaS
Let's apply this template to a hypothetical scenario. You're building TaskFlow, a project management tool for creative agencies. Here's a condensed analysis of three competitors.
Competitor 1: monday.com (Direct)
Overview: Founded 2012, raised $574M, ~1,800 employees, public company. Mass market work management platform.
Product: Visual boards, automations, integrations, templates. Strong customization. Mobile apps. No native creative features (proofing, asset management).
Pricing: $9-19/user/month. Minimum 3 seats. Free tier very limited. Enterprise pricing available.
Positioning: "A Work OS that powers teams to run projects and workflows with confidence." Broad appeal, not vertical-specific.
Customer feedback: Praised for visual interface, templates. Criticized for complexity at scale, expensive for larger teams, learning curve.
Strengths: Brand awareness, resources, integration ecosystem.
Weaknesses: Generic—not built for creative workflows. No proofing. Asset management requires integrations. Pricing gets expensive.
Strategic implication: Don't compete on breadth. Win on creative-specific features: visual proofing, asset versioning, client feedback loops.
Competitor 2: Asana (Direct)
Overview: Founded 2008, raised $453M, public company. Premium work management for enterprises.
Product: Tasks, projects, portfolios, goals, reporting. Strong for process-heavy teams. Timeline views.
Pricing: Free tier up to 15 people. Premium $10.99/user, Business $24.99/user. Enterprise custom.
Positioning: "The best platform for cross-functional work." Enterprise-focused, process-oriented.
Customer feedback: Loved for structure and reporting. Criticized for overwhelming UI, rigid workflows, not intuitive for simple needs.
Strengths: Enterprise penetration, investor confidence, robust feature set.
Weaknesses: Overkill for small agencies. Creative teams find it too rigid. No proofing.
Strategic implication: Position as "Asana simplicity with creative superpowers." Target agencies who've tried Asana and found it too heavy.
Competitor 3: Spreadsheets (Indirect)
Overview: Google Sheets, Excel. Zero cost, universally known.
Product: Infinite flexibility. No structure. No workflow. Pure chaos at scale.
Pricing: Free (Google) or bundled (Microsoft 365).
Positioning: Not a competitor to PM tools—that's the problem and opportunity.
Customer feedback: "It's fine for now." "We've outgrown it." "Looking for something purpose-built."
Strengths: Free, familiar, flexible.
Weaknesses: No task management, no accountability, no visibility, painful collaboration.
Strategic implication: Your biggest competitor isn't monday or Asana—it's inertia. Make switching from spreadsheets effortless.
TaskFlow's Competitive Position
Based on this analysis, TaskFlow should:
- Lead with creative-specific features: Visual proofing, asset versioning, client portals
- Position against complexity: "Built for creative agencies, not enterprise bureaucracy"
- Price for small teams: Beat monday on per-seat value for teams under 20
- Provide migration paths: Easy import from spreadsheets, templates for common agency workflows
- Own the vertical: Be the obvious choice when someone searches "project management for agencies"
Where to Find Competitor Data
Free Tools
| Tool | What It Provides |
|---|---|
| SimilarWeb | Traffic estimates, sources, geography |
| Employee count, growth, job postings | |
| Crunchbase | Funding, investors, news |
| G2/Capterra | Reviews, ratings, feature comparisons |
| Wayback Machine | Historical website changes |
| Google Alerts | Ongoing competitor mentions |
| BuiltWith | Tech stack information |
| Facebook Ad Library | Active ad campaigns |
Paid Tools
| Tool | What It Provides |
|---|---|
| Ahrefs/SEMrush | SEO data, keywords, backlinks |
| SpyFu | Paid search intelligence |
| Owler | Revenue estimates, news |
| Pitchbook | Detailed funding data |
Direct Research
- Sign up for free trials: Experience the product yourself
- Read their blog: Understand their thought leadership
- Watch demo videos: See how they sell
- Join their webinars: Hear their pitch
- Talk to their customers: Ask about pros and cons
- Follow on social: See their content strategy
How to Identify Competitor Weaknesses
The best opportunities hide in competitor blind spots. Here's how to find them:
1. Mine Negative Reviews
Go to G2, Capterra, and app stores. Filter for 1-3 star reviews. Look for patterns:
- "Wish it had..."
- "Switched because..."
- "Support was..."
- "Too complicated for..."
- "Not worth the price..."
If ten reviews mention the same complaint, that's a validated weakness.
2. Analyze Churn Reasons
If you can talk to former customers of competitors (ethically—through your normal sales process), ask:
- "What were you using before?"
- "Why did you switch?"
- "What was missing?"
3. Study Job Postings
Competitor job postings reveal priorities and gaps:
- Hiring for a feature team? They're building something new.
- Hiring lots of support staff? They have scaling problems.
- Hiring enterprise sales? They're moving upmarket.
4. Track Feature Releases
Set up monitoring for competitor changelogs. Slow release velocity might indicate tech debt. Rapid releases in one area might indicate where they're doubling down.
5. Test Their Support
As a prospect, ask their sales and support teams hard questions. Response time, quality, and depth reveal operational maturity.
Positioning Against Competitors
Once you understand the landscape, you need to position your startup clearly. Here are proven positioning strategies:
Strategy 1: Own a Segment
Instead of competing with everyone, dominate a specific segment.
- monday.com: Everyone
- TaskFlow: Creative agencies only
Narrower positioning makes marketing easier and product development more focused.
Strategy 2: Invert a Weakness
Take a competitor's acknowledged weakness and make it your headline strength.
- Competitors: Complex, enterprise-focused
- You: "PM software your whole team will actually use"
Strategy 3: Different Customer Job
Position around a different job-to-be-done.
- Asana: "Get work done"
- You: "Keep clients happy" (same tool, different frame)
Strategy 4: Technology Differentiation
If you have genuinely different technology, lead with that.
- Others: Manual workflows
- You: "AI-powered project management"
But be careful—technology claims without user benefits fall flat.
Maintaining Your Competitive Intelligence
Competitor analysis isn't a one-time project. Markets evolve. Set up ongoing monitoring:
- Google Alerts: Set alerts for competitor names, founder names, product names
- Review site monitoring: Check G2/Capterra monthly for new reviews
- LinkedIn tracking: Follow competitor company pages for updates
- Pricing checks: Quarterly pricing page screenshots
- Quarterly refresh: Update your full analysis every quarter
Store everything in a shared document. Make competitive intelligence part of your team's rhythm.
Accelerate Your Competitive Research
Building a comprehensive competitor analysis manually takes weeks. Gathering data, reading reviews, analyzing positioning—it's valuable work, but it's time you could spend building and selling.
Bedrock Reports includes automated competitive analysis as part of our investor-grade validation reports. We research your market, identify competitors, analyze their strengths and weaknesses, and show you where the opportunities are—all with cited sources.
The output isn't a replacement for deep competitive intelligence. But it compresses the research phase from weeks to minutes, so you can focus on the analysis and strategic decisions that actually move your business forward.
Keep Reading
- How to Validate a Business Idea — The complete validation framework
- The Startup Validation Checklist — 15 questions to assess any idea
- B2B vs B2C Validation — Different playbooks for different markets
- Founder-Market Fit — Why your background matters as much as your idea
Ready to understand your competitive landscape? Try Bedrock Reports free and get comprehensive competitor analysis with cited sources—in minutes, not weeks.
Maciej Dudziak
Founder of Bedrock Reports. Former tech lead and entrepreneur with a passion for helping founders validate ideas before they build. I created Bedrock Reports to give every entrepreneur access to investor-grade market research.
Validate your ideaFrequently Asked Questions
How many competitors should I analyze?
Focus on 3-5 direct competitors and 2-3 indirect competitors. Analyzing more than 8-10 competitors leads to analysis paralysis without adding meaningful insight. Start with the market leaders and any startups that have recently raised funding in your space.
How often should I update my competitor analysis?
Review your competitor analysis quarterly at minimum. Set up Google Alerts for competitor names and monitor their pricing pages, feature releases, and job postings monthly. Major events like funding rounds or product launches warrant immediate updates.
What if I can't find much information about a competitor?
Limited public information is itself valuable data—it might indicate a small team, limited marketing budget, or early stage. Use LinkedIn to estimate team size, the Wayback Machine to see historical changes, and review sites for customer feedback. If a competitor is truly invisible, they may not be a significant threat yet.
Should I include competitors from adjacent markets?
Yes, always include 2-3 indirect competitors or potential market entrants. The biggest competitive threats often come from companies in adjacent spaces who could easily expand into your market. Think about how Slack competed with email, not just other chat tools.
How do I know if my competitive advantage is real?
Validate your perceived advantages through customer interviews. Ask prospects why they chose you over alternatives, and ask churned customers why they left. If customers don't mention your supposed advantage unprompted, it may not be as meaningful as you think.
Ready to Validate Your Idea?
Turn insights into action. Test your business idea with real data from 30+ sources.
